If you didn't notice, Twitter got
enthusiastic about a small show of solidarity for SPC Ardmona. In
spite of various contradictions, the #SPCSunday hashtag took off.
Punters posted pics - “here's what I
bought” or “here's what we made”, others posted recipies.
Beneath, however, there was the
sneering undercurrent from those more concerned with “savviness”
than enthusiasm. They boiled down to:
- I don't like the product anyhow, and Italian tomatoes are better.
- You bought the product from Woolworths or Coles, and they're part of the problem.
- You do know that SPC Ardmona is part of Coca-Cola Amatil, don't you?*
To the last two, I offer no argument;
to the first, I'll just remark that you might want to run “Italy
tomato mafia contamination” into your search engine and get back to
me later.
The objections boil down to “if you
want to change the world, you're doing it wrong”.
Yes: there is a obvious contradiction
involved in going to Woolworths or Coles, buying a product from a
Coca-Cola subsidiary, posting the results on a US-owned social media
platform – all in a gesture of solidarity for farmers and workers
in the Goulburn Valley.
I'd even bet that a fair number of
people who ran with the #SPCSunday hashtag are actually smart enough
to perceive the irony.
But ahh, the savvy: a habit of thought
that transcends notions of right-or-left, because it's about the
dull, grey, humourless gaze-down-the-nose at the folly of the masses.
It's how I imagine a Catalan knight may once have looked at peasants
having fun.
It's just another condescension, “shut
up and leave the adults to talk.”
I address myself now to the savvy of
the left: just how well did your strategy work in, oh, the
2013 Federal election? “Miserable failure” is how I'd describe
it.
There is a fairly general agreement
that “voter disengagement” is worth worrying about.
But it's not “voter disengagement”
that's the problem – not directly. It's people
disengagement. Get people
interested, excited, and by the way having fun,
and I'd guess it's a damn sight easier to bring their votes along
with them.
What
happens when the savvy see people engaged, interested, excited, and
having fun? They put on the po-faced frown of the expert: “you're
doing it wrong.”
No,
we're not. You are. The savvy is the stealer of the soul of politics,
the enemy of engagement, the excluder of the outsider.
During
England's catastrophic Ashes series of 2013, the incomparable Kerry
O'Keeffe, a fine analyst of the game, looked at the English
high-performance coaching and risible dietary requirements, and
lumped it under the heading “the one-percenters”.
His
argument was that the Australian coach, Darren Lehmann, took a
low-performing team and focussed on bowling, batting, and fielding.
Only someone at the very top of their game, he said, had the luxury
of focussing on extracting an extra one-percent of performance by
exotic practises. England coach Andy Flower, he believed, was working
on the one-percent of performance when the team was having trouble
with the basics.
To the
savvy of the left, I say this: your research and focus groups – the
one-percenters – are no use to you right now. You need the basics:
getting people interested, excited, having fun.
Sneering
at an obvious success doesn't mark you down as intelligent,
knowledgable or knowing.
*It's been pointed out to me that CCA is majority locally-owned: how much difference this makes, I will leave to the reader.
*It's been pointed out to me that CCA is majority locally-owned: how much difference this makes, I will leave to the reader.
6 comments:
Thank you! Personally I'd prefer to act than just to sit back and shrug. Linda
Chirg's great work but shouldn't you be focussing on the Telco side of things?Rather then fiddling while NBNCo burns?
Sneers and condescension certainly don't help to change much or increase understanding. The intention to impress with the superiority of one's point of view as well as cleverness leads to exclusion and limits the possibility of future constructive and respectful dialogue.
K.O'K's point about high performing sports team success and avoiding reliance on 1% 'solutions' sits well with how #SPC action caught on - it was doable, shareable and lots of people seem to have enjoyed showing off their newly rediscovered enthusiasm for peaches and beans.
Great read, and thanks for the Italy tomato mafia contamination tip. I couldn't believe the number of snarky tweets about this. No, it probably won't have a major impact on the end result for SPCA, but at a time when there's so much awful to be had, I can't help but feel a little buoyed by this harmless attempt at expressing solidarity.
Great post Richard.
There are too many 'policy experts' on here.
If they got any more serious they'd spontaneously combust.
They spend their days poo pooing anything they consider beneath them.
They try to impress the Twitterati and don't see how truly needy and sycophantic they look.
I'm heartily sick of it.
I use Twitter to put a point of view.
I choose humour most of the time.
If I want want policy I'll go find it from experts.
The self styled/titled 'policy wonks' need to remember their one vowel change away from what they really are.
Thanks for the post.
I enjoyed the read.
Yesterday alone, there were over 4000 tweets from over 1500 people reaching over 1 million people on average 8 times.
I am looking at this from the perspective of a comparison between protesting with placards outside parliament and getting on the six o'clock news versus something that will send the same message with similar impact however with a longer reaching 'tail'.
Post a Comment