I've said this before, but it bears
repeating: I'm more than 50 years old, and for nearly all of those
years, “national security” has been trying to justify its
existence with scare-stories to frighten children.
Look around the Australia you see right
now, and ask yourself: is our lifestyle threatened more by
terrorists, or by the toxic combination of right-wing politics and
self-interested security agencies?
Well: in my entire life, Australia's terrorist
toll is the bombing of the Hilton Hotel – attributed wrongly, with
convictions overturned – and the bombing of the Israeli embassy in
the 1980s. That's the crop.
Oh, there was once a post-911 fool who
filled a Toyota Hiace with ANFO and set it off in the Dean's Park
defence land to see what would happen. And there's been utterly
incompetent plots to take over army bases, justly receiving their
convictions.
But in my whole life, being
tabloid-frightened by the idea that commies, Viet Cong, Serbian
terrorists (in the 70s, look it up), hackers, jihadists, boat people,
the Ananda Marga Sect (look it up) …
The net effect on “the Australian way
of life is zero …
...except that the agencies wrap their
dark wings around power and liberty, call it a success, and while
local councils tap phone records to discover unregistered pets, and
our communications are snooped and tapped, nobody is actually good at
threatening us.
The Milperra Massacre – performed by
the bikie gangs that hipsters now pay a tax to, to get their tattoos,
or pay to provide a Harley-Davidson escort to their weddings –
chalked up more deaths (seven) than Australia's entire terrorism
toll.
But the world of “national security”
isn't just about government agencies protecting their budgets: it's
also about consultants to those agencies, protecting their
budgets. And a consultant won't
get rich saying “defund ASIO and ASIS by 20 percent because there
isn't a credible threat”, will it?
And if
there's no local client for consultant money saying “pour tax
dollars into national security”, there'll always be an American
client to foot the bill: because America has outsourced its vile
trade in liberty and death to the private sector. And that private
sector earns its every calorie sucking at the teat of the taxpayer in
every damn country it plants its flag.
And as
a result: Australia is bombarded by our terrorist threat, and we will
lose our liberties and have our communications snooped on, and the
kind of media that print a “think tank study” without criticism
will work to lull us into accepting it.
I can
tell you, from my interactions on Twitter, that the people giving
this bad advice weren't even born – as in “I wasn't born when
Andanda Marga was a thing, what's your point?” – when most of the scare-stories were the tabloid staples of my youth. Which means the
entire history of “they're coming to get us” scare stories is in
the unreal past, whereas fear-of-bearded-Islam is a Real and Present
Danger.
As was
every other damn fake fear I was peddled in my lifetime. As the
cartoonist Matthew Martin put it: national security is a bunch of
turkeys with paper bags over their heads. They've offered not a damn
thing to my personal security nor political freedom in fifty years,
and I don't trust them now.
1 comment:
If it helps to get you through the day, try to imagine those same people you describe reaching retirement! After a working lifespan spent in secretive systems designed to monitor everyone's activities.
A good day for people in these organisation is one where they get to attempt redesign the data collection and reporting systems themselves to streamline the process of their work. That at least means brainstorming flowcharts.
An entire working lifespan spent monitoring boring surveillance of uninteresting people, then writing yawn-inducing reports designed to justify such interest? When the ennui sets in, it'll be difficult to dispel. :)
Post a Comment