Here’s an interesting statistic which might
inform what follows: Queensland has 200,000 solar PV installs in a state with
1.5 million homes – about 13%. In the 2010 federal election, the Greens
received 12.7% of Queensland’s Senate vote…
The Queensland Government is quickly going
from gimlet-eyed to wild-eyed, an imitation of cartoon villains lurking in dark
basements and giving the kind of laughs you used to have to hire Vincent Price
to get.
In fact, Jafar, or even Zigzag (Aladdin and The Princess and the Cobbler, respectively, both voiced by the late
Vincent) seem to offer up models of the kind of plotting and scheming, the
“drop a surprise on them”, that Cambell Newman is indulging in.
The latest relates to solar power, which I discovered at Climate Spectator and wrote up for The Register here.
The short version: there’s a proposal for
the government to change the way the energy market operates. Queensland
home-owners who have installed solar power would, under the proposal, be
required to sell their power to the government at a regulated low rate, and be
required to buy from the government at a regulated higher rate.
What they would not be allowed to do is treat the output of the panels on their
roof as their own.
It’s unbelievably coercive. If I were a
Queenslander (which I’m not), a solar power user (which I am), and connected to
the grid (not) … well, I’d be considering unplugging from the grid entirely,
buying a bunch of batteries, and seeing if I could get through the nights
without an interface to such a kooky government.
The discussion document is here, but it’s
pretty much too late for any submissions, since comments close Monday (it was
in a locked cupboard in a basement, sign saying “beware of the leopard”, you
know the drill).
You know: turning off lights if you’re not
in the room. Getting energy-efficient products. Sleeping on a mattress instead
of an electrically-heated water-bed. Stuff like that.
And why does this arise?
Remember that this isn’t just any
conservative government: it’s setting a standard for foam-flecked rabid-mouthed
ranting that Rush Limbaugh would have to admire.
Yet there is a genuine, rational economics
alternative to coercion: structure tariffs so that they accurately reflect
costs. Make the price of access to
the network accurately reflect the cost, instead of cross-subsidising network
access out of the usage fees.
That, however, would mean abandoning the
ideological crusade: solar equals greenies and greenies are godless and evil.
No comments:
Post a Comment