<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509</id><updated>2011-12-15T13:51:53.595+11:00</updated><category term='geodata'/><category term='Google  earth'/><category term='E-Books'/><category term='bushfires'/><title type='text'>The Happy Slacker</title><subtitle type='html'>Richard Chirgwin, telecommunications journalist, analyst, bushwalker and woodworker</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>50</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-2697647034578203191</id><published>2009-02-26T07:05:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-26T07:08:48.939+11:00</updated><title type='text'>How's this for tasteless?</title><summary type='text'>It's a good thing that the Canberra Times is trying to add sense to the debate surrounding bushfires and prescribed burning ( article). But the Google advertisement, placed over the headline, seems a bit tasteless to me. Here's how it presented in Firefox ...</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/2697647034578203191/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=2697647034578203191' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2697647034578203191'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2697647034578203191'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/hows-this-for-tasteless.html' title='How&apos;s this for tasteless?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_oDV84TYoL6U/SaWlIzWcKcI/AAAAAAAAAAM/ur6ul6ZtEf8/s72-c/ad_placement.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-5009316349827102353</id><published>2009-02-24T08:21:00.001+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T08:21:53.950+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Solar component prices in Australia</title><summary type='text'>Further to my post the other day about solar prices, I have conducted a brief study.I should at the outset make it clear that this is not comprehensive. I did not include every solar system component from every outlet, because that would take ages and nobody's paying for this. This is a brief, personal study. It does, however, indicate that a more complete analyst's study would be valuable: </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/5009316349827102353/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=5009316349827102353' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5009316349827102353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5009316349827102353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/solar-component-prices-in-australia.html' title='Solar component prices in Australia'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-8914685774266641168</id><published>2009-02-24T08:10:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-24T08:21:19.941+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Results</title><summary type='text'>Panels – The price per rated watt of output ranged from $7.72 to $11.92, so the most expensive panels are 154% more costly than the least expensive. The best price per watt in the study was available from  Solaronline  for a Sharp 180W panel.Batteries – Cost ranged from $131.68 per rated Ah up to $665.71 per Ah, making the most expensive batteries more than five times the price of the cheapest. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/8914685774266641168/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=8914685774266641168' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/8914685774266641168'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/8914685774266641168'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/results.html' title='Results'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-3220380789428916659</id><published>2009-02-21T19:19:00.002+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-21T19:25:52.859+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Quick observations on the solar industry</title><summary type='text'>I've just spent a piece of today costing out solar systems for home use, because soon I'll be starting to build a holiday shack on a little plot in the Southern Tablelands.I settled on price per watt as a handy benchmark because it was easy to calculate, and there were some surprises.The first is that the price variations are huge - the most expensive at retail are twice the price of the cheapest</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/3220380789428916659/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=3220380789428916659' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3220380789428916659'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3220380789428916659'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/quick-observations-on-solar-industry.html' title='Quick observations on the solar industry'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-582315983033998764</id><published>2009-02-16T07:59:00.002+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-16T08:12:56.325+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Let's burn a few social media straw men</title><summary type='text'>Perhaps it's the insecurity born of being the new kid on the block, but social media experts are full of criticism of journalists for not understanding or embracing social media. Their critiques are almost exclusively built on straw men, and I figure it's just as well to identify these.1) Journalists don't use Twitter.That's odd, because I know a bunch of Twittering journalists. In my immediate </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/582315983033998764/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=582315983033998764' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/582315983033998764'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/582315983033998764'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/lets-burn-few-social-media-straw-men.html' title='Let&apos;s burn a few social media straw men'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-6026370276389363559</id><published>2009-02-12T16:03:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-12T16:10:08.059+11:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Google  earth'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bushfires'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='geodata'/><title type='text'>Self Interest or Public Interest? - Google Maps Versus Crown Copyright</title><summary type='text'>!--   @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }   P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }  --&gt;The story goes like this: seeing that the Country Fire Authority Website was struggling (as, for that matter, was the Geosciences Australia Sentinel site), Google decided to run a mash-up on Google Maps to display fire locations and help people get the information they needed.It was able to secure information very </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/6026370276389363559/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=6026370276389363559' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6026370276389363559'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6026370276389363559'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/self-interest-or-public-interest-google.html' title='Self Interest or Public Interest? - Google Maps Versus Crown Copyright'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-1214308119555348606</id><published>2009-02-07T10:36:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2009-02-07T10:46:20.901+11:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='E-Books'/><title type='text'>A Non-Rigorous Calculation: Are E-Books Green?</title><summary type='text'>Just ask Steve Jobs: the best kind of marketing you can get is where your customers do the marketing for you. Buzz is everything.E-books are one of those markets. Users are absolutely convinced they're right about everything associated with e-books, and are happy to do the marketing on behalf of the industry (how stupid can you be, to act as an unpaid sales rep for anyone?). A quick round-up of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/1214308119555348606/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=1214308119555348606' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/1214308119555348606'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/1214308119555348606'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2009/02/non-rigorous-calculation-are-e-books.html' title='A Non-Rigorous Calculation: Are E-Books Green?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-2575846872677509404</id><published>2008-06-04T09:40:00.001+10:30</published><updated>2008-06-04T09:42:08.273+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Testing a new disto...</title><summary type='text'>I haven't posted for a while, partly because I've been busy with other things (including paying work), partly because I've been busy trying to get Linux to work properly.Eventually, I had to give up on the Freespire experiment on this laptop (Acer 5315). It's too easy to brick Freespire, thereby putting myself in a place from which the only escape is re-installation.For example: when I connected </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/2575846872677509404/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=2575846872677509404' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2575846872677509404'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2575846872677509404'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/06/testing-new-disto.html' title='Testing a new disto...'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-5157083719041421409</id><published>2008-05-06T11:36:00.001+10:30</published><updated>2008-05-06T11:38:20.295+10:30</updated><title type='text'>About the ITIF's Broadband Rankings</title><summary type='text'>!--   @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }   P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }  --&gt;It's nice to see a broadband measure that gives Australia a reasonable score. It's a pity there are so many flaws in the data's assumptions. I'm referring to the ITIF study published here.   Since last year, when with Market Clarity's Shara Evans (my then employer) I looked at the then-inadequate OECD data (it has </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/5157083719041421409/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=5157083719041421409' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5157083719041421409'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5157083719041421409'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/05/about-itifs-broadband-rankings.html' title='About the ITIF&apos;s Broadband Rankings'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-7211802535468731863</id><published>2008-05-01T10:27:00.002+10:30</published><updated>2008-05-01T10:29:35.395+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Digital Dividend or Free Spectrum?</title><summary type='text'>So what's the value of the "digital dividend"?The question arises because that silly expression is so ineradicable in the political lexicon. A "digital dividend" is out there somewhere, we just have to (as Senator Conroy put it) "put in the hard work" and we'll reap the rewards.The commercial data that led to America's recent spectrum auctions raising $19 billion aren't on the public record. We </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/7211802535468731863/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=7211802535468731863' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/7211802535468731863'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/7211802535468731863'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/05/digital-dividend-or-free-spectrum.html' title='Digital Dividend or Free Spectrum?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-3283156411155370905</id><published>2008-04-28T09:53:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-28T09:54:21.853+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Farewell CDMA...</title><summary type='text'>The CDMA network was never going to last forever. Did AMPS last forever? Even GSM will be killed off one day.However, as the CDMA switch-off approaches, I can say one thing that most of the Sydney-centric IT press can't say: I have seen first-hand that there are places where CDMA works and NextG doesn't work.Last week, I took a trip down to Bendigo to see some relatives, some of whom live to the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/3283156411155370905/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=3283156411155370905' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3283156411155370905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3283156411155370905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/farewell-cdma.html' title='Farewell CDMA...'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-903683030237723433</id><published>2008-04-14T11:28:00.003+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-14T11:35:15.862+10:30</updated><title type='text'>How to Build an Insecure Environment</title><summary type='text'>One of the worst habits in the IT industry is for engineers to do things "because they can".Today's manifestation of "because we can" comes from Cisco, which is introducing application server capability to routers. The idea is that since all your traffic's going to pass through a router, why not put the application right there in the router, so that the application is where the traffic is?It's a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/903683030237723433/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=903683030237723433' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/903683030237723433'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/903683030237723433'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-build-insecure-environment.html' title='How to Build an Insecure Environment'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-4793696598057099263</id><published>2008-04-10T11:09:00.001+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-10T11:10:45.125+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Telemetry and 3G</title><summary type='text'>Telstra is spruiking the wonders of telemetry over the 3G network.It's an interesting thought, although not quite bleeding-edge. After all, telemetry over cellular networks has been with us for a while - even if it's hard to find in carriers' financial reports.The reason it's hard to locate in the financials is, of course, because the telemetry market is so small that it doesn't warrant a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/4793696598057099263/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=4793696598057099263' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/4793696598057099263'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/4793696598057099263'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/telemetry-and-3g.html' title='Telemetry and 3G'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-8642281775095239614</id><published>2008-04-08T14:35:00.003+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-08T15:08:01.623+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Who will save us from bad software?</title><summary type='text'>No, this is not part of my ongoing battles with Linux (the sound's died again, by the way. Damned if I'm reinstalling...).What's on my mind here is the more general issue of software quality. More precisely, what's going to be the impact of crap software on the world at large?My washing machine is a case in point. Unlike the old world of washing machines, where a complex and breakable machine (a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/8642281775095239614/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=8642281775095239614' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/8642281775095239614'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/8642281775095239614'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/please-save-me-from-software.html' title='Who will save us from bad software?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-6676158181216533896</id><published>2008-04-08T12:20:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-08T12:23:25.316+10:30</updated><title type='text'>The Old “Peak Speeds” Game Again</title><summary type='text'>I'll have more to say on this in Communications Day next week – I need a little time for research – but it may as well be blogged as well.Part of the ongoing muddying of the waters in Australia's WiMAX-versus-mobile debate comes from confusion about the intended applications of technologies (for example, fixed WiMAX is older than mobile and therefore it's obsolete).But the misuse of speed </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/6676158181216533896/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=6676158181216533896' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6676158181216533896'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6676158181216533896'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/old-peak-speeds-game-again.html' title='The Old “Peak Speeds” Game Again'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-3757743248122171618</id><published>2008-04-07T14:05:00.002+10:30</published><updated>2008-04-07T14:10:02.306+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Could the New Zealand Institute's Fibre Co Work?</title><summary type='text'>For some time, I have believed that the structure of Australia's telecommunications industry and networks should have been sorted out before privatisation of Telstra went ahead, rather than after.The problem is that when they're bent on a privatisation, governments are happy to take the biggest cheque they can get – something like structural reform of an industry might reduce the sale price, so </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/3757743248122171618/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=3757743248122171618' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3757743248122171618'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/3757743248122171618'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/could-new-zealand-institutes-fibre-co.html' title='Could the New Zealand Institute&apos;s Fibre Co Work?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-2673181898483750620</id><published>2008-04-05T08:55:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2008-04-05T08:56:17.317+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Where on Earth is my Microphone?</title><summary type='text'>I recall reading research that says Linux users do it partly for the fun. As a full-time, no-safety-net, no-dual-boot Linux user myself, I'm mystified by the definition of "fun" these people must use.Philip K Dick once described psychosis as being typified by an inability to see the easy way out. Dammit, I can see the easy way out, but I've already put too much of my stuff into the Linux </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/2673181898483750620/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=2673181898483750620' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2673181898483750620'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/2673181898483750620'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/where-on-earth-is-my-microphone.html' title='Where on Earth is my Microphone?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-4752197672096853978</id><published>2008-04-03T12:22:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2008-04-03T12:23:09.440+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Opel Coverage: Why is WiMAX Obsolete?</title><summary type='text'>A day after the news story broke, there isn't much to add to the facts themselves: the Australian government cancelled the contract for the Opel (Optus / Elders) consortium to build a broadband network combining ADSL2+ and WiMAX; the Opel partners are upset; the opposition is outraged; and Telstra is gloating; and so on.The decision to unplug the Opel contract received plenty of media attention, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/4752197672096853978/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=4752197672096853978' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/4752197672096853978'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/4752197672096853978'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/opel-coverage-why-is-wimax-obsolete.html' title='Opel Coverage: Why is WiMAX Obsolete?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-6375689812977283317</id><published>2008-04-01T09:05:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2008-04-01T09:11:33.542+11:00</updated><title type='text'>The Life of the Linux Newbie</title><summary type='text'>OK: it's not a proper blog. For a start, there's no link-farming. Second, no plagiarism (bloggers often don't dig ideas like "fair use" and "attribution". For them, it's about hitrates: whatever gets clicks is good). And third, I promise to try and offer moderately readable articles.Mostly I'll be talking about telecommunications, sometimes computing, sometimes life in general.But first, I want </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/6375689812977283317/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=6375689812977283317' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6375689812977283317'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/6375689812977283317'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/life-of-linux-newbie.html' title='The Life of the Linux Newbie'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-5410114304747602055</id><published>2008-04-01T08:46:00.003+11:00</published><updated>2008-04-01T09:10:53.634+11:00</updated><title type='text'>On the Loose Again</title><summary type='text'>Some time ago - about two years ago! - I found it too hard to combine life as an analyst and life as a blogger, for two reasons: I had to self-moderate so as not to spoil the professional life with the fun life; and there just wasn't time to blog.Now I'm freelance again, and so with any luck I will get to blog again. I wish I could find some way to move all the old posts into an archive directory</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/5410114304747602055/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=5410114304747602055' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5410114304747602055'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/5410114304747602055'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2008/04/one-loose-again.html' title='On the Loose Again'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-114808241897909981</id><published>2006-05-20T10:14:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2006-05-20T10:16:58.993+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Rules for Google Reporting</title><summary type='text'>Google Maps has discovered Australia: and the press gave a vivid illustration of the rules Australian media follow when reporting on Google.First and foremost, the Prime Directive is "go soft". Google is surrounded by a skepticism-removal field, Australian media can't get rid of that bit of cultural cringe which says "Australia needs to be noticed", and put together, the end result is a welter of</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/114808241897909981/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=114808241897909981' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/114808241897909981'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/114808241897909981'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2006/05/rules-for-google-reporting.html' title='Rules for Google Reporting'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-114769098534899282</id><published>2006-05-15T21:30:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2006-05-15T21:33:05.360+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Thought is not property</title><summary type='text'>"Patents and copyrights are the legal implementation of the base of all property rights: a man's right to the product of his mind."So wrote Ayn Rand, a deity of libertarian thought.Her cry has been taken up by "intellectual property" lobbyists the world over (example here), but most particularly in America, where Rand is still considered to be a great philosophical thinker.Rand was wrong, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/114769098534899282/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=114769098534899282' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/114769098534899282'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/114769098534899282'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2006/05/thought-is-not-property.html' title='Thought is not property'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-113261713860151760</id><published>2005-11-22T09:15:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-11-22T10:52:18.643+11:00</updated><title type='text'>The $100 publicity device</title><summary type='text'>It's one of those stories that people just can't resist: self-publicist and acclaimed guru Doctor Nick - sorry, Nicholas Negroponte - pops up in Tunis at the WSIS Summit promising $100 PCs for the world's starving children.Rather than critique the stunt itself, it's also instructive to take a look at what happened in the media, which was simple: it was taken as gospel. You know that guru-worship </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/113261713860151760/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=113261713860151760' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/113261713860151760'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/113261713860151760'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/11/100-publicity-device.html' title='The $100 publicity device'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-113148371604553327</id><published>2005-11-09T07:59:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-11-09T08:01:56.056+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Sony's Rootkit Gets the Go-By From Australian Journalists</title><summary type='text'>By now most people with a vague interest in stories about computers know that Sony tried to distribute copy-protection software with the characteristics of a rootkit with music CDs. The result was that playing the CD on a home PC would install the software; the software would hide itself; and it was difficult and dangerous to uninstall. What's fascinated me about the story is that it had almost </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/113148371604553327/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=113148371604553327' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/113148371604553327'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/113148371604553327'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/11/sonys-rootkit-gets-go-by-from.html' title='Sony&apos;s Rootkit Gets the Go-By From Australian Journalists'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-112815158054556177</id><published>2005-10-01T17:48:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-10-01T17:56:20.550+10:30</updated><title type='text'>They Drop Like Flies in Korean Cafes!</title><summary type='text'>It's easy to understand why a daily might give space to a suspect wire story on its Web page: there are too many wire pieces and there's too little time.  However, it's fair to say that the wires have a very, very long tradition of falling prey to urban legend. One of my favourites, "Man Dies in Internet Cafe", has made its annual appearance again, with a wire story spending more than a month </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/112815158054556177/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=112815158054556177' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/112815158054556177'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/112815158054556177'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/10/they-drop-like-flies-in-korean-cafes.html' title='They Drop Like Flies in Korean Cafes!'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-112815078454682932</id><published>2005-10-01T17:42:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-10-01T17:44:25.326+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Media Advocacy</title><summary type='text'>The question you never ask about a blog is whether anyone's reading it. They're not and they don't, unless of course you proactively point someone at it. Well, I have kids and a job and all sorts of things to keep me busy other than this.But after a long silence, there are a couple of things which warrant some words, and this is the only outlet.First, there was this piece of silliness about the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/112815078454682932/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=112815078454682932' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/112815078454682932'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/112815078454682932'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/10/media-advocacy.html' title='Media Advocacy'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111878729884018701</id><published>2005-06-15T08:43:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-06-15T08:44:58.846+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Grafedia: Conditioning users to insecurity</title><summary type='text'>The press release view of Grafedia is that it's a new social phenomenon. Fine. I've never held the sort of rosy view of the world which expects a perfectly comprehensive and accurate description of something in a press release. But one of the jobs that media can claim as its own should surely be sufficient knowledge and scepticism to identify the whole of an elephant even if the press release </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111878729884018701/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111878729884018701' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111878729884018701'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111878729884018701'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/06/grafedia-conditioning-users-to.html' title='Grafedia: Conditioning users to insecurity'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111433683494623929</id><published>2005-04-24T20:24:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-04-24T20:31:00.736+10:30</updated><title type='text'>News Limited Eats the Fruit of the Idiot Tree</title><summary type='text'>Since we're giving some attention to News Limited outlets, why not this piece of drivel:http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,15065935%255E913,00.htmlIn what might have been an otherwise reasonable story about mobiles substituting for landlines we get this:"Fixed lines face a further challenge from wireless technology offered by three big players, Unwired, Personal </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111433683494623929/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111433683494623929' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111433683494623929'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111433683494623929'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/04/news-limited-eats-fruit-of-idiot-tree.html' title='News Limited Eats the Fruit of the Idiot Tree'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111420900575357892</id><published>2005-04-24T01:57:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-04-23T09:00:05.756+10:30</updated><title type='text'>A Lesson in Ignorance: Don't Even do Easy Research</title><summary type='text'>It's a while since I poked fun at The Australian, but this story is just irresistible. http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,15044655%5E15306%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html Avoiding the crime of stealing a story wholesale for the blog, the essence is a very thin piece of information: the long-awaited (by some) Enum trial in Australia is starting at last. With a very thin press release to go on, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111420900575357892/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111420900575357892' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111420900575357892'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111420900575357892'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/04/lesson-in-ignorance-dont-even-do-easy.html' title='A Lesson in Ignorance: Don&apos;t Even do Easy Research'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111336867097737695</id><published>2005-04-13T15:17:00.000+10:30</published><updated>2005-04-13T15:34:30.980+10:30</updated><title type='text'>Take one dead horse, one whip, and one empty space to fill...</title><summary type='text'>This must be the nonscoop of the month ...   http://www.theage.com.au/news/Outsourcing/Actors-union-shouts-cut-on-digital-film/2005/04/11/1113071894581.html "Actors' union shouts 'cut' on digital film"  Wow, the Herald is up to the mark and racing ahead of time. This is one month old. Not a couple of days, or even a week.  To my knowledge, the story first emerged in the middle of March with a </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111336867097737695/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111336867097737695' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111336867097737695'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111336867097737695'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/04/take-one-dead-horse-one-whip-and-one.html' title='Take one dead horse, one whip, and one empty space to fill...'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111160924449667860</id><published>2005-03-24T07:19:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-24T07:28:12.393+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Syndicating the Scare Story</title><summary type='text'>From the Associated Press comes this world-syndicated sensation: "Hackers gained personal information of 59,000 people affiliated with a California university - the latest in a string of high-profile cases of identity theft."   We have here pretty much a full house of tabloid assumptions. Something happened to a computer so it was hackers, and they gained personal information so it's a case of </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111160924449667860/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111160924449667860' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111160924449667860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111160924449667860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/syndicating-scare-story.html' title='Syndicating the Scare Story'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111078537551690819</id><published>2005-03-14T18:24:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-14T18:43:38.146+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Howler of the Week</title><summary type='text'>The Sydney Morning Herald (gee, Fairfax quality control is out the door lately) has this utter gem in a story about a Green's proposal to add Kids Helpline to Telstra's USO obligations:"The amendment would include the number for Kids Helpline, the only national 24-hour phone counselling service for young people in distress.  "People should know that a fully privatised Telstra will shed this </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111078537551690819/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111078537551690819' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111078537551690819'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111078537551690819'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/howler-of-week.html' title='Howler of the Week'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111069309448706193</id><published>2005-03-13T16:44:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-13T16:51:34.490+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Redefining "Most"</title><summary type='text'>Just a snippet.  I have put a fuller version of this on CommsWorld but I find it amusing that Telstra's plan to put in 500,000 ADSL2+ ports has been re-interpreted by the Sydney Morning Herald,  here  as being ADSL2+ to most households.Half a million out of eight million isn't "most" of anything. It's just a piece of thoughtless, throwaway hype designed to lend excitement to what was an otherwise</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111069309448706193/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111069309448706193' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111069309448706193'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111069309448706193'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/redefining-most.html' title='Redefining &quot;Most&quot;'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111057652779664281</id><published>2005-03-12T08:27:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-12T08:28:47.800+11:00</updated><title type='text'>The SCADA Cyberterror Beat-Up</title><summary type='text'>One of the more irritating habits of the IT industry in Australia is that US vendors believe they can ship American assumptions over to Australia and apply them, pretty much without adjustment, to their view of the Australian market (analysts do this as well. I well recall that in the 90s, a Gartner analyst told Australians with a straight face that ADSL was no good because it didn't work well on</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111057652779664281/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111057652779664281' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111057652779664281'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111057652779664281'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/scada-cyberterror-beat-up.html' title='The SCADA Cyberterror Beat-Up'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-111014257478513444</id><published>2005-03-08T02:42:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-07T07:56:14.786+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Keeping the Industry's Secrets</title><summary type='text'>When a segment of the media gets too close to its industry, you get some strange outcomes. One of those is that the press tries to respect the secrets of the industry, instead of trying to uncover and report them.Over the last 24 hours, the wires have started lighting up with reports of a new malware, Serchmeup, which downloads a slew of exploits into the target machine. The journalists don't </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/111014257478513444/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=111014257478513444' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111014257478513444'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/111014257478513444'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/keeping-industrys-secrets.html' title='Keeping the Industry&apos;s Secrets'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110999059011836502</id><published>2005-03-06T09:40:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-05T13:43:10.123+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Correlation Equals Cause</title><summary type='text'>VoIP is one of those hot-button technologies. All you have to do is stick it in a press release, and the media's critical facilities go out the window. Instead, the hacks and proxy publicists will not only run with the press release, they'll also run up a heap of bromides inserted into the stories using the Disruptive Technologies Phrase Grabber.Hence when Telstra (Australia's incumbent telco) </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110999059011836502/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110999059011836502' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110999059011836502'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110999059011836502'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/correlation-equals-cause.html' title='Correlation Equals Cause'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110979513587627693</id><published>2005-03-04T14:23:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-03-03T07:33:59.736+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Two Obvious Questions that the AFR Didn't Ask</title><summary type='text'>I can't post a link to the story, because the Australian Financial Review is one of those odious subscription-only publications. Well, it's got a rich readership, I suppose...So instead, I'll give you the gist: private investigators in Australia are complaining that privacy laws are making it hard to collect debts. This got a bit of discussion on the Link newsgroup, which represents some really </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110979513587627693/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110979513587627693' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110979513587627693'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110979513587627693'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/03/two-obvious-questions-that-afr-didnt.html' title='Two Obvious Questions that the AFR Didn&apos;t Ask'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110953638995222052</id><published>2005-03-01T02:32:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-28T07:43:35.950+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Objectivity or Scepticism?</title><summary type='text'>To continue the thoughts from my last post about the bad science of the Global Consciousness Project, the question is: "why does bad science journalism matter?" The reasons are many, but I'm going to stick to a few, which cluster around one key issue: the public can't make good decisions on bad information. Who are the heralds of that information? The journalists. But we keep reporting on things </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110953638995222052/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110953638995222052' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110953638995222052'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110953638995222052'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/objectivity-or-scepticism.html' title='Objectivity or Scepticism?'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110894455300390042</id><published>2005-02-21T11:04:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-21T11:12:57.570+11:00</updated><title type='text'>How a Mistake Becomes a Fact</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;First, you create a story, then you keep it going not by facts or confirmation, but by repetition. And if you remember the infamous "Internet traffic doubling every X days" myth of the late 1990s, eventually anyone who nay-says the original "fact" is the outsider.   When it emerged at the Senate Estimates last week that CSIRO had spent $9 million over </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110894455300390042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110894455300390042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110894455300390042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110894455300390042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/how-mistake-becomes-fact.html' title='How a Mistake Becomes a Fact'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110876137966998830</id><published>2005-02-19T08:12:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-19T08:16:19.686+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Pseudo-Science Reporting: How to Sell Fakery</title><summary type='text'>This is going to have to be broken into a couple of blog entries, because it's going to be long. On Red Nova, you can find this story  about the "Global Consciousness Project", in which random number generators are believed to be predicting the future:  Today's entry is going to dissect aspects of the story itself; I'll follow it up with another entry drawing the threads together.  I haven't </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110876137966998830/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110876137966998830' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110876137966998830'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110876137966998830'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/pseudo-science-reporting-how-to-sell.html' title='Pseudo-Science Reporting: How to Sell Fakery'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110858689335465363</id><published>2005-02-17T07:44:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-17T07:48:13.360+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Flogging a Dead Angle</title><summary type='text'>Unwired has killed its VoIP trials according to AustralianIT.Why am I not surprised? Because pretty much the same news was given by the same source last December.Here is the premise for yesterday's story in the Oz:  "WIRELESS internet provider Unwired has killed off a planned voice over IP (VoIP) offering for its Sydney broadband subscribers.  Announcing the company's financial results, Unwired </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110858689335465363/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110858689335465363' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110858689335465363'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110858689335465363'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/flogging-dead-angle.html' title='Flogging a Dead Angle'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110849983487630675</id><published>2005-02-16T07:34:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-16T07:37:14.880+11:00</updated><title type='text'>ComputerWorld Columnists, Again</title><summary type='text'>Another week, another filler column from ComputerWorld which puts forward silly suggestions based on an insane premise. If ComputerWorld fields aggrieved that I'm picking on it, it should make itself a smaller target...This time, the columnist (Frank Dzubeck of Communications Network Architects, whose Website says "Index of /") asks "Can the Internet Ever be Trusted?" and calls for the formation </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110849983487630675/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110849983487630675' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110849983487630675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110849983487630675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/computerworld-columnists-again.html' title='ComputerWorld Columnists, Again'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110808887157071186</id><published>2005-02-11T13:26:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T13:27:51.646+11:00</updated><title type='text'>VoIP didn't kill Telstra, Again!</title><summary type='text'>One of the fondest bits of the telco journalist’s utopia in Australia is that there’s a technology just around the corner which will destroy Telstra.    Telstra is about as popular in Australia as Microsoft. The enthusiasm for “get Telstra” stories is so strong that it overrides any consideration of factual rigour.   &lt;!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--&gt;    The story de jour is from Gerry Barker of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110808887157071186/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110808887157071186' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110808887157071186'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110808887157071186'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/voip-didnt-kill-telstra-again.html' title='VoIP didn&apos;t kill Telstra, Again!'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110789695862870723</id><published>2005-02-10T03:07:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:58:21.756+11:00</updated><title type='text'>VoIP Security: the Story Overlooked in the Rush to Reprint the PR</title><summary type='text'>When the VoIP Security Alliance was formed, the press release put (as Puck might put it) a girdle around the earth several times over.And with the ready-made news story right there in the wire filler, nearly nobody saw any need to add value to the story by noticing that Skype and Vonage, the biggest brands in VoIP, have left industry standing at the altar like abandoned bridegrooms at a Moonie </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110789695862870723/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110789695862870723' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110789695862870723'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110789695862870723'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/voip-security-story-overlooked-in-rush.html' title='VoIP Security: the Story Overlooked in the Rush to Reprint the PR'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110776997380951760</id><published>2005-02-09T16:00:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:58:00.703+11:00</updated><title type='text'>New Scientist Suckered by "News to Me" Syndrome</title><summary type='text'>One of the most fatal traps for the journalist to fall into is "news to me": where someone considers a story as newsworthy because they hadn't heard of it before.It's a particular vulnerability of anyone writing about technology, because tech journalists come to the story expecting it to be new. The very first thing the new IT journalist needs to learn is that most of it isn't news; it's just </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110776997380951760/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110776997380951760' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110776997380951760'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110776997380951760'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/new-scientist-suckered-by-news-to-me.html' title='New Scientist Suckered by &quot;News to Me&quot; Syndrome'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110764655450207853</id><published>2005-02-07T05:32:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:51:16.766+11:00</updated><title type='text'>A recipe, and a reason for it.</title><summary type='text'>My own recipe for pancakes is seriously "gold code", having been the Sunday breakfast for about 15 years. It only fails for people who can't follow four-step instructions.Put two cups of plain flour and four teaspoons of baking powder into a food processor, and spin it for about five seconds.  Put in two eggs, run the food processor for about 15 seconds. Put in a pint of buttermilk (Australian </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110764655450207853/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110764655450207853' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110764655450207853'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110764655450207853'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/recipe-and-reason-for-it.html' title='A recipe, and a reason for it.'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110733047016210972</id><published>2005-02-02T18:46:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:50:03.646+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Editors Need to Control Even Their Contributors</title><summary type='text'>Well, well. The very thing I like most about Mozilla, its security, is according to a Jupiter Research dude writing for ComputerWorld (here: http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,99142,00.html)its biggest problem.I've been using Firefox myself for ages, having finally swapped from Netscape and being a long-time IE refusenik.However, that's the home persona. At various</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110733047016210972/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110733047016210972' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110733047016210972'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110733047016210972'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/02/editors-need-to-control-even-their.html' title='Editors Need to Control Even Their Contributors'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110720655084070514</id><published>2005-02-01T08:21:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:47:00.620+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Devaluing News with Google</title><summary type='text'>Ever since its launch, a mythology has grown up around Google News based on the way it's been hyped by people who ought to know better. The hype covers a couple of misconceptions which are driving a fairly complete mythology about Google News, most recently in my eyes seen in a short video published here:oak.psych.gatech.edu/~epic/The misconceptions undermine not just the popular understanding of</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110720655084070514/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110720655084070514' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110720655084070514'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110720655084070514'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/01/devaluing-news-with-google.html' title='Devaluing News with Google'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110711699995054487</id><published>2005-01-31T08:24:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:54:31.870+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Diving Into the World of Blogging</title><summary type='text'>This is merely the "hello world" of this blog.Having complained for some years about the shortcomings of the IT press (after nearly 18 years as a participant), I was asked by a friend "So why not host a blog about it?"Here's the blog. I'll know whether to thank the friend for the suggestion after I've found out how much effort is involved...In the meantime, I would expect to come up with the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110711699995054487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110711699995054487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/01/diving-into-world-of-blogging.html' title='Diving Into the World of Blogging'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10509509.post-110711926692942360</id><published>2005-01-31T08:06:00.000+11:00</published><updated>2005-02-11T12:53:16.910+11:00</updated><title type='text'>Protecting journalistic access: don't offend the talent.</title><summary type='text'>Lots of people, reading this Vunet piece (http://www.vnunet.com/news/1160853) from the point of view of Linux advocacy, will have dismissed the article as being written to serve the interests of an advertiser (Microsoft).They would be wrong.Sure, the journalist seems to have avoided the chance to ask a couple of challenging questions, instead happy to merely note-and-quote what Microsoft says </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/feeds/110711926692942360/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10509509&amp;postID=110711926692942360' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110711926692942360'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10509509/posts/default/110711926692942360'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://chirgwin.blogspot.com/2005/01/protecting-journalistic-access-dont.html' title='Protecting journalistic access: don&apos;t offend the talent.'/><author><name>Richard Chirgwin</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16526072768607449952</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
